The prices shown here are for informational and comparison purposes only and may change. For the most up-to-date and official pricing, please visit our official Pricing Page.

Homerun Pricing (2026) and Simpler Alternative

Homerun pricing starts at approximately $53 per month when converted from €49/month, and is structured around employee seats and active job slots.

For teams hiring only a few times per year, the lower entry pricing may feel sufficient early on.

As hiring becomes more active, the structure starts to matter more. Pricing is tied to:

• Number of employee seats
• Number of active job slots
• Annual commitments on higher plans

For many teams, the real question becomes:

💡 How often will we outgrow the plan structure as hiring expands?

This matters most when multiple departments begin hiring at the same time. A plan that feels affordable early on can become restrictive once recruiting activity increases across the business.

AvaHR approaches hiring capacity differently. Plans are built around broader hiring flexibility, giving teams more room to grow before needing to upgrade.

Below is a breakdown of Homerun pricing, followed by a side-by-side comparison with AvaHR so you can see how both platforms scale as hiring needs evolve.

👉 See how AvaHR compares to Homerun >

Homerun can work well for lean teams managing a smaller number of openings.

As recruiting becomes more active, job slot availability often becomes the deciding factor in how smoothly hiring workflows continue.

Here’s how Homerun pricing is structured across its plans:

Homerun Pricing

Homerun Pricing Plans

⚠️ Note: Homerun pricing scales through employee seats and job slot availability. Teams hiring across multiple departments may need higher plans sooner as recruiting activity increases.

One important thing to consider is how quickly job slot limits can affect day-to-day hiring.

For example:

• a marketing role
• sales hire
• customer support opening
• operations position

can already push smaller plans close to capacity.

That’s where hiring flexibility starts to matter more than the starting price alone.

AvaHR Pricing Plans

AvaHR uses a pricing structure designed around broader hiring capacity rather than tightly controlling active openings.

Instead of scaling through small increases in job slots, the plans are built to support hiring momentum as teams grow.

✅ This gives companies more room to continue hiring without needing to rethink plan limits every few months.

AvaHR Pricing Plans

✅ Note: AvaHR plans are structured to support larger hiring capacity jumps, helping teams avoid frequent plan changes as recruiting expands.

What stands out about AvaHR pricing

The biggest difference is not only the monthly cost.

It’s how much hiring activity each plan is designed to support before operational friction starts appearing.

With AvaHR:

• teams can manage more openings simultaneously
• hiring workflows stay consistent longer
• recruiting expansion feels less tied to seat restrictions and slot limits

This becomes especially noticeable for companies hiring across:

• multiple departments
• multiple locations
• seasonal growth periods

Instead of planning around capacity ceilings, teams can focus more on maintaining hiring momentum.

Why this matters as teams grow

Hiring rarely stays static for long.

A company that only needs one role open today may suddenly need:

• onboarding support hires
• sales expansion
• customer success recruiting
• leadership hiring

all within the same quarter.

When pricing structures are heavily tied to job slots, scaling hiring activity can start affecting workflow decisions.

AvaHR is designed to reduce that operational friction by giving teams broader hiring capacity earlier in the pricing structure.

That makes forecasting hiring software costs simpler as recruiting needs evolve.

If you’d like to see it in action, you can start a free AvaHR trial and explore how its pricing structure aligns with your hiring workflow.

👉Start hiring without constantly adjusting plans >

When AvaHR makes more sense

AvaHR is often a better fit for teams that expect hiring activity to become more consistent over time.

It works especially well if your team:

• hires across several departments simultaneously
• expects recruiting needs to expand during growth phases
• wants fewer operational limits tied to pricing
• prefers pricing that remains easier to forecast long-term

For very small teams with low hiring volume, Homerun may feel sufficient early on.

As hiring complexity increases, flexibility tends to become more valuable than entry-level pricing alone.

FAQs: Homerun Pricing vs AvaHR

How much does Homerun cost?

Homerun pricing starts at approximately $53/month for the Starter plan, with higher tiers increasing based on employee seats and job slot availability.

Does Homerun offer a free trial?

Yes. Homerun includes a 15-day free trial with access to most ATS and HR features.

What affects Homerun pricing the most?

The biggest pricing factors are:

• employee seat limits
• active job slot limits
• annual commitments on higher plans

How does AvaHR pricing compare?

AvaHR starts at $99/month annually and offers broader hiring capacity within each plan, especially for teams managing multiple open positions.

Which platform is easier to scale with?

Homerun scales through seat and job slot increases.

AvaHR uses larger hiring-capacity tiers, which can reduce the need for frequent plan changes as recruiting expands.

Homerun vs AvaHR: Which should you choose?

Homerun can work well for smaller teams managing lower hiring volume and fewer simultaneous openings.

The challenge usually appears once hiring becomes more active across the organization.

Because pricing is tied closely to:

• job slot availability
• employee seats
• yearly commitments

teams may outgrow smaller plans faster than expected.

AvaHR takes a broader-capacity approach designed to support growing recruiting activity with fewer operational constraints.

👉 If your team expects hiring to grow over time, AvaHR offers a structure designed to support hiring growth with fewer operational constraints.